Third party interference in the arbitration dispute " a comparative study"

Abstract

Interference of both types - offensive or joining - in the arbitration dispute depends mainly on the idea of linking the case, as it is only accepted by its connection to the original case until it is accepted, and this link is what guarantees the realization of the advantages for which either of them was allowed to intervene and also guarantees distance from arbitrariness if it is used without control, and the modern jurisprudence and judicial approach approves the acceptance of the intervention in its two forms in the arbitration dispute even though it was not a signatory to the arbitration agreement, and this is a departure from the original relativity of the arbitration dispute unless It stipulated for that intervention conditions that must be met, the most important of which is the agreement of the parties and the arbitral tribunal on the intervention of others in the arbitration dispute, and upon approval, the intervening third party is considered as a party to the arbitration agreement, and therefore a party to the arbitration dispute.