Evidence of the propulsion of lying about the narrator

Abstract

This research addresses the issue of the propulsion of lying about the narrator, with the aim of knowing the evidence through which lying about the narrator can be paid, resulting in its modification, demobilization, acceptance or reply.

I took the inductive approach, extrapolating the texts of modern scholars and their applications in propelling lying about the narrator, and the analytical approach by analyzing those texts to arrive at the evidence of propelling lying about the narrator.

its section for introduction, prelude, researchers and conclusion; Introduction: I mentioned the reasons for the selection of the subject, its importance, its problem, its objectives, its approach and plan, and mentioned in the preliminary introduction some of the matters that are an input to the main topic of research, such as the narrator's mistake and intentional lying, and in the first research: the evidence of the propulsion of lying about the narrator that relates to his or her updating, narrative and hearing, and in the second study: the evidence of lying about the narrator's situation.

One of the most notable findings of the research is that not everyone who has told a lie may have made a mistake, a clip, or been included in his book, but also the possibility that contemporary scholar could use these clues to weigh those who have disagreed between his mistake and his lies.