Constraints on the Criminal judge's Authority in Evaluating Electronic Evidence

Abstract

This research examines the constraints on the authority of criminal judges in evaluating electronic evidence, focusing on the Yemeni legal system. It highlights how technological advancements have led to cybercrimes and digital evidence, yet traditional Yemeni laws fail to keep pace, creating challenges in the admissibility and proof of electronic evidence. 

The study addresses the legality of electronic evidence, its value in conviction or acquittal, and its legal status in Yemen, along with the applicability of existing legal restrictions. It also explores the impact of digital authenticity on criminal procedures and compares the Latin and Anglo-Saxon systems regarding illegally obtained evidence. 

The research concludes that Yemeni laws require updates to address legislative gaps, including enacting a dedicated cybercrime law and amending evidence and criminal procedure laws to ensure the legitimacy and admissibility of electronic evidence.