Article

Legal Status of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operators in Non-International Armed Conflicts

This research addresses a contemporary legal issue arising from the increasing use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (Drones) in Non-International Armed Conflicts (NIACs): the "Legal Classification of Operators." The central problem lies in the ambiguity of the legal status of individuals managing remote combat operations, particularly given the absence of the "combatant" status in NIACs and the rising role of civilian contractors. The study aims to analyze the criteria for "Direct Participation in Hostilities" (DPH) and their applicability to various operator functions (reconnaissance, navigation, and execution). The research concludes by proposing a precise legal framework to distinguish between operators as legitimate military targets and their entitlement to civilian protection, highlighting the implications for international criminal responsibility in cases of mis-targeting.

Ali Naji Al-Awj Corresponding

  • تخصص قانون دولي عام وحقوق إنسان- كلية الشريعة والقانون جامعة صنعاء

Hikmat Ahmed Abdulhameed Al-Amrani

  • Department of Public International Law, Faculty of Sharia and Law, - Sana'a University, Sana’a, Yemen.

Sinan Abdullah Hassan Al-Du'ais

  • Department of Public International Law, Faculty of Sharia and Law, - Sana'a University, Sana’a, Yemen.
Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

0
Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations

How to Cite

Legal Status of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operators in Non-International Armed Conflicts. (2026). Sana’a University Journal of Human Sciences, 5(10), 809-849. https://doi.org/10.59628/jhs.v5i10.3090