Article

Dental Cast Measurement Variations in Patients with Maxillary Anterior Crowding: A Comparative Study

Authors
Naela Al-Mogahed
Department of Orthodontics, faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen
Hani Homaid
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen
Khalid Aldhorae
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Ibn Al-Nafis University for Medical Sciences, Sana’a, Yemen.
Ghamdan Al.Harazi
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen
Ahmed Obeyah
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen.
Salah Alhaidary
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen.
Ahmad Kahoul
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen
Foud Al- Motrab
Department of Orthodontics, faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen.
Maram Abdo Taleb
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen
Sadam Ahmed Elayah
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jiblah University for Medical and Health Sciences, Ibb, Yemen
Hassan A Al-Shamahy
Departement of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Republic of Yemen
Abstract

 Background: Dental crowding, a common orthodontic issue, arises due to a mismatch between tooth size and jaw dimensions, significantly affecting dentofacial aesthetics. This study focused on maxillary anterior crowding (M x AC) to investigate its relationship with the tooth size and jaw dimensions.


Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 80 participants divided into two groups: 40 with normal occlusion (control) and 40 with MxAC occlusion. Dental casts were prepared using alginate impressions and dental stones, and measurements were taken for mesiodistal dimensions, arch width, arch depth, overbite, overjet, and arch length discrepancy using a modified sliding caliper gauge. Differences between the two groups were compared using an independent t-test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.


Results: Significant differences were observed in tooth dimensions and arch measurements between the M × AC and control groups (P< 0.001). The M × AC group had larger dental crowns (except for the first molar), smaller overjet, and greater arch length discrepancy. The control group exhibited larger arch widths in the first premolar, second premolar, and first molar positions, but not in the canine position (P=0.420). Additionally, the M x AC group had significantly smaller arch depths at the canine, first, and second premolar positions (P< 0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between the groups in dental arch depth at the first molar position (P=0.120).


 Conclusion: The study found significant differences in tooth dimensions and dental arch measurements between the M × AC and control groups. The M × AC group had larger dental crowns (except for the first molar), less overjet, and greater arch length discrepancy. Arch widths for the premolars and the first molar were larger in the control group, while the M x AC group had smaller arch depths at the canine and premolar positions. These findings underscore the need for customized orthodontic treatment.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References

How to Cite

Dental Cast Measurement Variations in Patients with Maxillary Anterior Crowding: A Comparative Study. (2024). Sana’a University Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 18(5), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.59628/jchm.v19i4.1433

Most read articles by the same author(s)